Samba 4: Failed build on Ubuntu 12.04

Rowland Penny repenny at f2s.com
Mon Sep 10 08:43:55 MDT 2012


On 10/09/12 15:17, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:12 AM, steve<steve at steve-ss.com>  wrote:
>> On 09/09/2012 09:41 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:54 PM, steve<steve at steve-ss.com>  wrote:
>>>> Please: What is ABI? This box has been building fine until the latest
>>>> git:
>>>>
>>>> [3719/3954] abi_check: bin/default/source3/libpdb.so
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol pdb_nds_get_password has been removed - please update
>>>> major version
>>>>       signature: int (struct smbldap_state *, char *, size_t *, char *)
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol priv2ld has been removed - please update major version
>>>>       signature: LDAP *(struct ldapsam_privates *)
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol get_userattr_list has been removed - please update
>>>> major
>>>> version
>>>>       signature: const char **(TALLOC_CTX *, int)
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol smbldap_search_domain_info has been removed - please
>>>> update major version
>>>>       signature: NTSTATUS (struct smbldap_state *, LDAPMessage **, const
>>>> char
>>>> *, bool)
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol ldapsam_search_suffix_by_name has been removed - please
>>>> update major version
>>>>       signature: int (struct ldapsam_privates *, const char *, LDAPMessage
>>>> **,
>>>> const char **)
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol pdb_ipa_init has been removed - please update major
>>>> version
>>>>       signature: NTSTATUS (void)
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol pdb_nds_set_password has been removed - please update
>>>> major version
>>>>       signature: int (struct smbldap_state *, char *, const char *)
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol pdb_nds_init has been removed - please update major
>>>> version
>>>>       signature: NTSTATUS (void)
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol groupmap_attr_list has changed - please update major
>>>> version
>>>>       old_signature: 0xXXXX
>>>>       new_signature: {attrib = 3, name = 0xXXXX "gidNumber"}, {attrib =
>>>> 30,
>>>> name = 0xXXXX "sambaSID"}, {attrib = 31, name = 0xXXXX "sambaGroupType"},
>>>> {attrib = 40, name = 0xXXXX "sambaSIDList"}, {attrib = 16, name = 0xXXXX
>>>> "description"}, {attrib = 12, name = 0xXXXX "displayName"}, {attrib = 11,
>>>> name = 0xXXXX "cn"}, {attrib = 24, name = 0xXXXX "objectClass"}, {attrib
>>>> =
>>>> 0, name = 0xXXXX}
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol pdb_init_ldapsam has been removed - please update major
>>>> version
>>>>       signature: NTSTATUS (struct pdb_methods **, const char *)
>>>> libpdb.so: symbol groupmap_attr_list_to_delete has changed - please
>>>> update
>>>> major version
>>>>       old_signature: 0xXXXX
>>>>       new_signature: {attrib = 30, name = 0xXXXX "sambaSID"}, {attrib =
>>>> 31,
>>>> name = 0xXXXX "sambaGroupType"}, {attrib = 16, name = 0xXXXX
>>>> "description"},
>>>> {attrib = 12, name = 0xXXXX "displayName"}, {attrib = 40, name = 0xXXXX
>>>> "sambaSIDList"}, {attrib = 0, name = 0xXXXX}
>>>> Waf: Leaving directory `/home/steve/samba-master/bin'
>>>> Build failed: ABI for libpdb.so has changed - please fix library version
>>>> then build with --abi-update
>>>> See http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Waf#ABI_Checking for more information
>>>> If you have not changed any ABI, and your platform always gives this
>>>> error,
>>>> please configure with --abi-check-disable to skip this check
>>>>
>>>> I have not changed ABI. I have no idea what it is. I am an end user. Do I
>>>> try ./configure.developer --abi-check-disable? If so what am I missing?
>>> There are few symbols which are pulled into libpdb because of other
>>> subsystems are included as part of module dependencies. Your
>>> configuration seem not to build them. You can use --abi-check-disable
>>> right now but I'll track down what exactly triggers these and update
>>> the definitions so that irrelevant symbols are not leaking through.
>>> There were few I've masked already.
>>>
>>> ABI check is good in general, we need to work on cleaning up libpdb
>>> like I did with libsmbldap last week.
>>>
>> Hi
>> Can confirm that with:
>>
>> --abi-check-disable
>> now builds on Ubuntu 12.04.
>>
>> Can you tell me when you have the patch and I'd gladly test it. The problem
>> is that it comes right near the end of make and on a slow box with only 384
>> RAM that's near on an hour.
>>
>> BTW builds out of the box on openSUSE so may be something Debian/Ubuntu
>> specific.
> The fix that worked for me on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS is in master now.
>
>
when did it get pushed to master? the reason for asking is that I pulled 
from git this morning and built on Ubuntu 12.04 server without any 
problem. Version 4.0.0beta9-GIT-e3b6b46

Rowland


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the samba-technical mailing list