kai at samba.org
Thu Oct 18 07:46:43 MDT 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 2012-10-17 05:18, simo wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 13:16 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
>> Sure, but nobody objects to discussing. :-)
>> It's the vote now before we discussed attitude that irritates
> Quite sensitive people here ... It didn't irritate me, actually I
> do not see what's irritating there. If everyone +1 we'd have it
> already implemented and nobody would be irritated.
> Now it happened that not everybody agreed, and they through -1s as
> well as a tantrum.
Ok, I change my mind. It's not the voting that is irritating, it's the
fact that bringing up concerns is constantly belittled as "semantics"
or throwing a tantrum.
That really annoys the heck out of me. If I happen to disagree with
the proposal, apparently I'm a whiny, progress-and-good-code-hating
self-centred jerk. Way to go on a technical debate.
Worldforge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the samba-technical