consesnus

[Kai Blin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2012-10-17 05:18, simo wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-17 at 13:16 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
>> Sure, but nobody objects to discussing. :-)
>> 
>> It's the vote now before we discussed attitude that irritates 
>> people.
> 
> Quite sensitive people here ... It didn't irritate me, actually I 
> do not see what's irritating there. If everyone +1 we'd have it 
> already implemented and nobody would be irritated.
> 
> Now it happened that not everybody agreed, and they through -1s as 
> well as a tantrum.

Ok, I change my mind. It's not the voting that is irritating, it's the
fact that bringing up concerns is constantly belittled as "semantics"
or throwing a tantrum.

That really annoys the heck out of me. If I happen to disagree with
the proposal, apparently I'm a whiny, progress-and-good-code-hating
self-centred jerk. Way to go on a technical debate.

Cheers,
Kai

- -- 
Kai Blin
Worldforge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlCACDUACgkQEKXX/bF2FpT4gACeJ/EesH5WUFryO4Qh7EJdkhVz
pEMAoI5ERdgaBBTT3B1/s2EKPatNHOch
=Zof6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----