We need to stop voting (was: Re: Code review required for commits - formal Team vote.)

[Michael Adam]

I didn't notice this mail while writing mine.
It reads like a good summary of mine though. :-)

Good night - Michael

On 2012-10-17 at 09:16 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 01:38 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > 
> > If you want to officially make this proposal I'm happy to
> > withdraw mine in favour of this.
> 
> At this point, we need to stop voting, and instead work with each other
> to find constructive ways to solve this.  Michael's proposal is
> certainly closer to something I think I can live with, but I still have
> some concerns.  
> 
> A genuine trial needs the genuine participation of the participants.
> That can only be obtained by consent, so a majority vote simply won't
> help, we have to work out an improvement to our process that we all can
> live with. 
> 
> Let's just leave this for a few weeks, and return to it with a sense of
> good will and community later in the year. 
> 
> I hope I've explained why our team unity is more important than this or
> any other technical or development style issue, but if you need help,
> perhaps talk to Michael about why the subtle differences in his proposal
> really do matter. 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Bartlett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 206 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20121017/298e8daf/attachment.pgp>