SV: SV: ctdb relock file issues with glusterfs

Mon Oct 15 16:07:35 MDT 2012

THANK YOU!!!

This did it for me :)

Ping_pong is now showing correct results

Morten

-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: samba-technical-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-technical-bounces at lists.samba.org] På vegne av Christopher R. Hertel
Sendt: 15. oktober 2012 20:50
Til: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Emne: Re: SV: ctdb relock file issues with glusterfs

Morten, Patrick:

Please try your tests with the following option on mount:
   --direct-io-mode=enable

Let us know whether that changes your test results.

Thanks.

Chris -)-----

On 10/15/2012 10:59 AM, Morten Bøhmer wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> For the heck of it I installed a couple of Centos virtual servers and configure ctdb+glusterfs+xfs+samba, got it working, but without relock.
>
> Not sure how important it is, but I guess time will show :)
>
>
> Morten
>
> Fra: patrick medina [mailto:pgmedinajr at gmail.com]
> Sendt: 15. oktober 2012 17:57
> Til: Morten Bøhmer
> Kopi: Michael Adam; samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> Emne: Re: ctdb relock file issues with glusterfs
>
> Morning Morten,
>
> I have been out of the office since Thursday, but am back today and ready to knock this out.  I'll keep you posted on what i find later this afternoon.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Morten Bøhmer <Morten.Bohmer at pilaro.no<mailto:Morten.Bohmer at pilaro.no>> wrote:
> Hi Patrick
>
> Any luck with your setup yet ?
>
>
> I am now seriously looking into trying some other clusterfs to make ctdb work.
>
>
> Morten
>
>
> Fra: patrick medina 
> [mailto:pgmedinajr at gmail.com<mailto:pgmedinajr at gmail.com>]
> Sendt: 10. oktober 2012 17:56
> Til: Michael Adam
> Kopi: Morten Bøhmer; 
> samba-technical at lists.samba.org<mailto:samba-technical at lists.samba.org
> >
> Emne: Re: ctdb relock file issues with glusterfs
>
> Thanks Michael,
>
> The way you explained ping_pong (going from "1"
> to "2") isn't explain as well on the wiki so i'll test and most likely verify it will not increment.
>
> Cheers - Gil
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Michael Adam <obnox at samba.org<mailto:obnox at samba.org>> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> as indicated elsewhere already, before even trying to start and debug 
> ctdb, you should make sure that your cluster setup provides correct 
> posix fcntl byte range locks, by using the ping_pong tool shipped with 
> the ctdb package:
>
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ping_pong
>
> It is important to verify that the locks really reach "the other 
> node", i.e. there is real lock contention.
>
> This can in particular be tested with the -rw option to
> ping_pong: If you run "ping_pong -rw /path/to/file 3" on one node and 
> then "ping_pong -rw /path/to/file 3" on a second node, you should see 
> the "data increment" notice (going from "1"
> to "2"), indicating that you now have two processes operating on the 
> same file. If this stays constant (at 1) then your gluster setup does 
> not provide sufficient fcntl byte range lock support.
>
> Another way to verify this without "-rw" is using file that is one too 
> small:  run "ping_pong /path/to/file 2" on one node and then the same 
> command on a second node. These should block and not print positive 
> lock rates. If instead both happily print positive lock rates then 
> your locks don't reach the other node and you need to fix your 
> setup...
>
> Cheers - Michael
>
> On 2012-10-09 at 22:21 +0000, Morten Bøhmer wrote:
>> Can confirm that I am experiencing the exact same issue.
>>
>> Would love to be able to solve this .....
>>
>>
>> Morten
>> ________________________________________
>> From: 
>> samba-technical-bounces at lists.samba.org<mailto:samba-technical-bounce
>> s at lists.samba.org> 
>> [samba-technical-bounces at lists.samba.org<mailto:samba-technical-bounc
>> es at lists.samba.org>] on behalf of patrick medina 
>> [pgmedinajr at gmail.com<mailto:pgmedinajr at gmail.com>]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:10 AM
>> To: 
>> samba-technical at lists.samba.org<mailto:samba-technical at lists.samba.or
>> g>
>> Subject: Re: ctdb relock file issues with glusterfs
>>
>> Afternoon/Morning Samba folks,
>>
>> I finally made some progress this afternoon, let me explain what I found.
>>
>> 1.  When I created the lock file, I had set it to chmod 777 
>> (rwxrwxrwx) Thinking about permissions, I recreated the lock file with rw-r--r--.
>>   After doing this I am now able to bring one node to healthy at a 
>> time, but the other node will stay unhealthy.  I am able to juggle 
>> healthy nodes by shutting the ctdb service down and the 2nd node will become healthy.
>>
>> Log file on the unhealthy nodes complain about the recovery lock file 
>> not
>> locked:
>>
>> 2012/10/09 14:55:40.335328 [set_recmode:16493]: ctdb_recovery_lock: 
>> Got recovery lock on '/mnt/gluster/ctdb/lock'
>> 2012/10/09 14:55:40.335448 [set_recmode:16493]: ERROR: recovery lock 
>> file /mnt/gluster/ctdb/lock not locked when recovering!
>>
>>
>> 2.  I created new mount point on one of the nodes, so each node has a 
>> unique mount to gluster.  Depending on which node starts first, the 
>> unhealthy node complaints about the others recovery lock location.  
>> How can this be if each node has it's on config file to go off of?
>>
>> Node1:  CTDB_RECOVERY_LOCK="/mnt/fuse/ctdb/lock"
>> ctdb_recovery_lock: Unable to open /mnt/gluster/ctdb/lock - (No such 
>> file or directory)
>>
>>
>> Node2:  CTDB_RECOVERY_LOCK="/mnt/gluster/ctdb/lock"
>> ctdb_recovery_lock: Unable to open /mnt/fuse/ctdb/lock - (No such 
>> file or
>> directory)
>>
>> Thanks again, I'm not sure where to troubleshoot next.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gilbert
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net<mailto:martin at meltin.net>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:32:12 +1100, Amitay Isaacs 
>>> <amitay at gmail.com<mailto:amitay at gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:55 PM, patrick medina 
>>>> <pgmedinajr at gmail.com<mailto:pgmedinajr at gmail.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Howdy samba folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been running into a lot of issues lately with ctdb's re-lock 
>>>>> file
>>> and
>>>>> glusterfs as the shared storage.  When I started, I could get one 
>>>>> or
>>> the
>>>>> other node to become healthy, but at least one would complain it 
>>>>> could
>>> not
>>>>> lock the re-lock file.  Nowi'm at the point where neither node 
>>>>> will
>>> become
>>>>> healthy and stay in a recovery loop.  Just to be sure it was the
>>> re-lock
>>>>> file, I commented it out in the config and both nodes became healthy.
>>>
>>>> What version of CTDB are you using? Can you attach the log file 
>>>> where you notice CTDB is continuously going in recovery? It would 
>>>> be useful to get log files from all the nodes.
>>>
>>> Michael Adam and I took a look at this on the weekend.  Gilbert sent 
>>> me some logs and this was happening:
>>>
>>>    ctdb_recovery_lock: Got recovery lock on '/mnt/gluster/ctdb/lock'
>>>
>>> That seems to indicate that locking isn't working as expected...
>>>
>>> peace & happiness,
>>> martin
>
>

--
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/     -)-----   Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/   -)-----   ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/     -)-----   crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/    -)-----   crh at ubiqx.org