Code review required for commits - formal Team vote.
abartlet at samba.org
Sun Oct 14 15:38:13 MDT 2012
On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 11:41 -0400, simo wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 09:06 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> > On 2012-10-13 04:23, simo wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 02:23 +0200, Kai Blin wrote:
> > >> On 2012-10-13 01:13, Michael Adam wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> comments: * I don't yet understand the reasons for "-1"s
> > >>
> > >> My reason for a -1, as I've tried to explain on both my mail and
> > >> on IRC is that I'd like to try this out first, just like we did
> > >> for autobuild. Jeremy however proposes a policy change now, and
> > >> says if we don't like it later, we can try to get another policy
> > >> change done. That's not what trying things out should look like.
> > >> Apparently that makes me opposed to progress, but I can live with
> > >> that.
> > >
> > > Hi Kai, can you explain what 'try it out' means in this case ?
> > To quote from my previous mail:
> > """
> > The way I see a trial working was that everybody tries to do reviews
> > on patches sent to samba-technical, and everybody agrees to not push
> > code directly. Basically, we do whatever the initial proposal was,
> > without actually having it as a rule. And then, once we tried it for a
> > while, we have a vote on whether we want to make the system mandatory.
> > """
> > Jeremy said on IRC that he doesn't believe this is going to work, but
> > it's still how I'd prefer this would be handled.
> Fine by me, I've been basically doing this except for the most trivial
> patches for the past 2-3 years, so from my point of view I am well into
> the trial, I have no problem prolonging it.
I'm confused by what you are saying you have done. I don't think you
are saying that you have not pushed any of your own patches in the past
2-3 years, but I just want to check.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
More information about the samba-technical