Code review required for commits - Discuss.
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Fri Oct 12 00:43:15 MDT 2012
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 04:07:34PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 06:54:50PM -0400, Ira Cooper wrote:
> > I think Matthieu has a point here, and it is important. Timely review
> > is going to be key.
> > And I'm going to amend myself: If there is code that has sat for 3
> > business days, the author/sponsor may push. A simple flag for review
> > will buy time to do the review on complex code. Use your brain. But
> > if there are no flags... that is consent from "samba-technical".
> I'm ok with that. If someone ignores a patch on samba-technical for
> 3 days without even saying "I want to review this" then it's probably
> good to go.
Just for my understanding (lots of mails to read...): Does
this mean that if I ask someone for review and I get no
response whatsoever, I am free to push it without review? Or
do I have to get someone else to review it?
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
More information about the samba-technical