Code review required for commits - Discuss.
scott.lovenberg at gmail.com
Thu Oct 11 16:23:30 MDT 2012
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Ira Cooper <ira at samba.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Matthieu Patou <mat at samba.org> wrote:
> > On 10/11/2012 12:48 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
> >> Actual formal suggestion:
> >> No team member commits their own code. All code will be "signed off"
> >> by two team members, as a team member you may sign off your own code.
> >> The "non-author" team member will be responsible for pushing the code.
> >> If there are two they can agree among themselves. ;)
> > To my french mind the wording seems a bit confusing, are you saying
> > that:
> > 1) every author could (should?) add their own sign-off
> > 2) in total 2 sign-off are need, which means at least 1 non-author
> > review
> > (but can be two if the author decide not to sign-off it's patch)
> That is correct.
> Time to time we all write things that need some more review, and we
> know it. Not signing them off is a way to say "Hey, I want a second
> reviewer, because I know this is hairy." I actually have some code
> sitting around that may trigger that, because of what it plays with
> Also it covers all "non-team" code, they all go through 2 sign-offs.
Ira, we discussed this a bit in the IRC channel today, but I'm
curious. How does this work for a non-member that has code in Samba?
Can I maintain the parts of code that I've written without two team
members signing off? It's really not a big deal, but we might as well
get these things ironed out while there is discussion going on.
Peace and Blessings,
More information about the samba-technical