When setting a non-default ACL, don't forget to apply masks to SMB_ACL_USER and SMB_ACL_GROUP entries.
jra at samba.org
Fri Oct 5 09:44:33 MDT 2012
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 06:01:08PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 22:28 +0200, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > commit 6575d1d34fee45c7a965c7c9641cc52b566a9e7f
> > Author: Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org>
> > Date: Tue Oct 2 10:15:54 2012 -0700
> > When setting a non-default ACL, don't forget to apply masks to
> > SMB_ACL_USER and SMB_ACL_GROUP entries.
> With this change, does this mean we have changed the mapping between
> posix ACLs and NT ACLs?
> If so, I'm concerned that any NT ACLs that have been set with
> vfs_acl_xattr will be invalidated, as the hash won't match up.
Andrew, it *never* matters on set, it only matters on get.
On set we will a re-hash, so changing the mapping on sets
More information about the samba-technical