Help: Error in samba4.local.talloc in autobuild

[simo]

On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 23:57 -0400, simo wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 13:49 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 23:46 -0400, simo wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 12:11 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 22:07 -0400, simo wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > I am trying to push my talloc_memlimit branch to master and I got this
> > > > > error twice in autobuild that is absolutely criptic to me:
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1346/1554 in 1h7m46s] samba4.local.talloc
> > > > > UNEXPECTED(error): samba4.local.talloc.memlimit (subunit.RemotedTestCase)(none)
> > > > > REASON: _StringException: _StringException: was started but never finished!
> > > > > UNEXPECTED(error): samba4.local.talloc.memlimit(none) (subunit.RemotedTestCase)
> > > > > REASON: was started but never finished!
> > > > > 
> > > > > As far as I can tell samba4.local.talloc simply runs (again) the talloc
> > > > > testsuite (why ??) and the normal tallo ctestsuite completes in a few
> > > > > seconds. So I do not understand why it would timeout here.
> > > > > 
> > > > > stodut and error logs do not shed any light, can someone help me
> > > > > understanding what is going on ?
> > > > 
> > > > What's happening here is that the test is failing, but the subunit
> > > > stream is incomplete, that is a test is declared as starting, but not as
> > > > finishing.  
> > > > 
> > > > However, the error code from the binary appears to be 0, as otherwise it
> > > > would be giving the familiar 'missing torture_fail()' line instead.
> > > > 
> > > > So, the 'never finished' is not a time-out, but an error in formatting
> > > > of the test stream. 
> > > 
> > > Ok 'which' test is failing ?
> > > I have no feedback from autobuild here.
> > 
> > Well as you noticed, it says samba4.local.talloc.memlimit, so I would
> > start there.
> > 
> > You may need to run it and make test manually and work that out - there
> > is nothing autobuild special about this error, it's all from 'make
> > test'.
> 
> Ok I've been looking again at the various talloc tests. So let me guess,
> autobuild interprets strings spit to output that start with "test: name"
> and then wait until it sees a string that start with "success: name" to
> determine a test was successful or not.
> 
> Am I on something here ?
> 
> Also why are we reaping the talloc testsuite twice in autobuild ?

lol reaping -> runnig, must have seen too many Zombie movies this
week :-)

> Isn't that a waste of time ?
> 
> Simo.
> 


-- 
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer <simo at samba.org>
Principal Software Engineer at Red Hat, Inc. <simo at redhat.com>