[PATCH] Build system tidyup, remove autoconf build of public shared libraries
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
Sun May 27 22:38:58 MDT 2012
On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 23:41 +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 12:14 +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > For the libraries which can be build standalone, talloc, tdb, tevent
> > I think it's 100% needed to just ever install the standalone ones into
> > the system.
>
> Thanks. As you reminded me on IRC, this would match the waf build,
> which will only produce a public library in the individual build systems
> for tevent, talloc, tdb etc.
I've put a series of patches for a tidyup of some build system stuff
(remove bits of the old build systems), and this at
https://git.samba.org/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/minor-fixes
> > For the rest we should think about possible users, are there any non Linux
> > users of libsmbclient or libnetapi?
>
> There seem to be references to libsmbclient on FreeBSD, but as FreeBSD
> is one of our 'must work' platforms for waf, that shouldn't be an issue.
>
> The real questions is are there non-waf-compatible users of
> libsmbclient, libnetapi or libsmbsharemodes. That's why I asked
> originally, but I can't think of a plausible case that would need these
> libraries, and can't run waf.
I've put this at
https://git.samba.org/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/build-fixes
I would like to push the minor-fixes branch in the next day or so, and
the build-fixes branch later this week, if there are no further
concerns.
Thanks,
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list