tdb_chainlock() in tdb1, tdb2 and tdb_compat ?

[Andrew Bartlett]

On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 08:40 -0400, simo wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 13:49 +0200, Christian Ambach wrote: 
> > On 05/10/2012 07:33 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > 
> > > Or we could just remove tdb1, as I planned, which will force us to fix
> > > any issues.
> > 
> > Who would deal with the required additions to the autoconf build?
> > You expressed some concerns about your ability to do that in the past.
> > 
> > > The API confusion which caused Volker to start this thread is due to my
> > > slow transition.
> > 
> > Is there an ETA until when the transition could be finished? I still see 
> > this as a blocker for the Samba4 beta release.
> 
> +1

I agree this is an important issue, but is there a reason to block the
beta release based on it, except to try and draw attention to the issue?
We do not currently have a regression in this area, and there will be
plenty of beta releases beyond this one to sort this out into.

We certainly should, now Rusty is back on board, set some deadlines for
sorting this out, but I don't think we should tie this internal
technical transition it to particular releases that our users can
otherwise test and enjoy. 

Thanks,

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org