tdb_chainlock() in tdb1, tdb2 and tdb_compat ?

Rusty Russell rusty at
Wed May 9 23:14:41 MDT 2012

On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:33:05 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer at> wrote:
> I think we should move to tdb2 eventually, but trying to support both
> tdb1 and tdb2 does add a fair bit of complexity (in terms of
> the build system and other code) with no huge gains at this
> point. We seem to have enough distractions for 4.0 as is.

So let's not do that.  It was never my intent to support tdb1 for the
4.0 release (except via tdb2, which if course supports tdb1).


More information about the samba-technical mailing list