Blockers in Bugfix-Releases (Re: [Release Planning 3.6] Samba 3.6.6 on May 31 (was May 24)?)
jra at samba.org
Tue Jun 5 15:30:36 MDT 2012
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:23:58PM +0200, steve wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 10:46 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:43:20PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> >The problem is (as we can readily show :-), is that
> >it's not always immediately obvious if something is
> >a security bug or not.
> Such as for example a file created on the underlying system being
> rw r r
> but under s3fs something totally different, and it not being able to
> chmod g+s
> on a share?
No, I can definitely say that's *NOT* a security bug. Some
> Yeah, you guys have worked wonders. s3fs is nearly there but hey, it
> could be misleading to others looking at e.g. file permissions.
> Dare I mention Bugzilla 8938 again?
No, you may not. :-).
More information about the samba-technical