After upgrading from alpha18 to beta2 ports 139 and 445 are no longer bound

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Wed Jul 11 04:19:45 MDT 2012


On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:11 +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Andreas Oster <aoster at novanetwork.de> wrote:
> > add the following to your smb.conf:
> >
> > server services = +smb -s3fs
> > dcerpc endpoint servers = +winreg +srvsvc
> 
> Thanks for the tip.
> 
> Is this sort of information to be found in a document somewhere?  

https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/s3fs

> I
> find it rather confusing that Samba 4 uses the same configuration file
> (smb.conf) as Samba 3, yet the file semantics are not the same. In
> particular, when I upgrade to beta2 the Ubuntu package installs
> /etc/samba/smb.conf but then Samba 4 reports errors in it.

Yes, we have not fully merged the parameter tables.  We know that we
still need to do it. 

> It looks as if the installed smb.conf has Samba 3 parameters which
> Samba 4 doesn't understand.  But what parameters _does_ Samba 4
> understand?

Essentially, the samba4 AD components (including the ntvfs file server)
honour the parameters listed with
 samba-tool testparm -v
The smbd file server, which is now the default in the DC honours
parameters listed with
 testparm -v

The idea is to merge these lists, so at least superficially the two
parsers behave identically, but it is a tedious task not yet finished. 

My guess is that the lack of the smbd file server is a packaging error
(perhaps complicated by it forcing a conflict with the samba 3.6
packages).

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org



More information about the samba-technical mailing list