Samba-vscan Problem

[SATOH Fumiyasu]

At Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:10:18 +0700 (WIT),
Hendra Manto Sitorus wrote:
> I have upgrade my samba from 3.0.33 to 3.3.3, that proces are success but I have a problem for samba-vscan. 

samba-vscan does not support Samba 3.2 and later.

My samba-virusfilter supports Samba 3.5 and 3.6.

  https://github.com/fumiyas/samba-virusfilter
  https://github.com/fumiyas/samba-virusfilter/downloads  

Regards,

-- 
-- Name: SATOH Fumiyasu (fumiyas @ osstech co jp)
-- Business Home: http://www.OSSTech.co.jp/
-- Personal Home: http://www.SFO.jp/blog/

> Error : 
> [2012/01/16 10:32:00.074547, 0] smbd/vfs.c:167(vfs_init_custom) 
> error probing vfs module 'vscan-clamav': NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL 
> [2012/01/16 10:32:00.074559, 0] smbd/vfs.c:309(smbd_vfs_init) 
> smbd_vfs_init: vfs_init_custom failed for vscan-clamav 
> [2012/01/16 10:32:00.074569, 0] smbd/service.c:846(make_connection_snum) 
> vfs_init failed for service hendra.manto.s 
> [2012/01/16 10:32:04.159921, 0] lib/module.c:59(do_smb_load_module) 
> Error trying to resolve symbol 'init_samba_module' in /usr/lib64/samba/vfs/vsc an-clamav.so: /usr/lib64/samba/vfs/vscan-clamav.so: undefined symbol: init_samba _module 
> [2012/01/16 10:32:04.159971, 0] smbd/vfs.c:167(vfs_init_custom) 
> error probing vfs module 'vscan-clamav': NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL 
> [2012/01/16 10:32:04.159984, 0] smbd/vfs.c:309(smbd_vfs_init) 
> smbd_vfs_init: vfs_init_custom failed for vscan-clamav 
> [2012/01/16 10:32:04.159993, 0] smbd/service.c:846(make_connection_snum) 
> vfs_init failed for service netlogon 
> [2012/01/16 10:32:11.986962, 0] lib/util_sock.c:474(read_fd_with_timeout) 
> [2012/01/16 10:32:11.987028, 0] lib/util_sock.c:1441(get_peer_addr_internal) 
> getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not connected 
> read_fd_with_timeout: client 0.0.0.0 read error = Connection reset by peer. 
> ------------------#####################------------------------------------------ 
> 
> I want to ask you, does samba-vscan ( 0.3.6c Beta5 ) support samba 3.3.3 ? 
> 
> How to solve that problem ?