remove chain_reply() ?

[Stefan (metze) Metzmacher]

Hi Volker,

> Under
> 
> http://git.samba.org/?p=vl/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/chain_reply
> 
> find a patchset that removes chain_reply() and replaces it
> with something that I think can be understood significantly
> easier. Possibly it should have been this way or similar
> right from the beginning... Seems to survive make test.
> 
> Comments?

Do we have a tests that expects async processing as part a
chain? Something like.

1. NTCreateAndX "test.txt" with batch oplock

2. NTCreateAndX "test.txt" with batch oplock + ReadAndX + Close

If that passes, I'm happy, but I fear it won't because of the
strict sync loop in construct_reply_chain().

metze

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20120228/8957097f/attachment.pgp>