remove chain_reply() ?

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher metze at
Mon Feb 27 20:32:55 MST 2012

Hi Volker,

> Under
> find a patchset that removes chain_reply() and replaces it
> with something that I think can be understood significantly
> easier. Possibly it should have been this way or similar
> right from the beginning... Seems to survive make test.
> Comments?

Do we have a tests that expects async processing as part a
chain? Something like.

1. NTCreateAndX "test.txt" with batch oplock

2. NTCreateAndX "test.txt" with batch oplock + ReadAndX + Close

If that passes, I'm happy, but I fear it won't because of the
strict sync loop in construct_reply_chain().


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 262 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list