[PATCH] smb2 FSCTL_SRV_COPYCHUNK support

[David Disseldorp]

Hi Richard,

On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:51:58 -0800
Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe at gmail.com> wrote:

> With respect to an earlier question about whether or not FSCTLs need
> to be done in the VFS, I would very much prefer that they are for a
> couple of reasons:

I'm all for having FSCTL handling in the VFS, my only concern is whether
to make the hooks per individual IOCTL (my preference), via the single
SMB_VFS_FSCTL hook currently only used by the smb1 server, or both.

Cheers, David