Add systemd support
ddiss at suse.de
Mon Feb 13 11:56:01 MST 2012
Finally getting back to this, sorry for the wait.
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:53:52 +0100
Sumit Bose <sbose at redhat.com> wrote:
> > It may also be worth considering a LimitNOFILE setting, ctdbd requires
> > one fd per client, exceeding the default limit under heavy load results
> > in a busy EMFILE loop around accept() (at least it did in ctdb-1.0.112).
> Please have a look at the new patch 0001, is this what you thought of?
The changes look good to me, thanks for submitting. FWIW it looks like
ctdb.sysconfig already has a commented out ulimit -n setting so patch
0001 may not be necessary.
More information about the samba-technical