process shared robust mutexes for tdb
Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
Tue Dec 25 03:37:55 MST 2012
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 02:58:01PM -0500, simo wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 09:43 -0500, Ira Cooper wrote:
> > Mutexes over mmap is actually fairly portable. It is the robust
> > mutexes over mmap that become less so. But even then, I know 2
> > platforms that support them. The Solaris/illumos family, and Linux.
> > That's not TOO bad.
> Well I do not really care for any other platform than Linux, but we
> historically cared for having samba run on at least Linux, *BSD and
> Solaris and some other Unix, although all the others seem to be dead or
> moribund now.
For all other platforms we just would not do this
optimization. The fcntl code is not removed.
> I believe those numbers are quite real indeed, context switches are a
> huge slow down with a pattern like the one used in our TDB files.
It's not only the context switches. It is the one single
linear list which needs to be mutexed in the kernel, and it
is the thundering herd that kicks in when a lock is
> Shouldn't it just be a matter of replacing every fcntl lock with an
> equivalent mutex ? What's harder about chain locks ?
It is the lock range. fcntl is a completely separate
offset/len space to the data itself. The current patch
allocates memory after the hash chains for the mutexes. You
can't do that for every record, on 64-bit linux mutexes are
24 bytes in size. You could add that to every record. We
might need to play with that when the basic code is in.
Regarding transactions it is more difficult: We need the
allrecord lock, which is a fcntl lock covering the whole
file. You can't do that with mutexes, you have to lock all
individual ones. There a reasonable linux kernel limitation
kicks in: The robustness code will only clean up 2048
mutexes when a process dies. That's why I decided to skip
transactional persistent tdbs for this.
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
More information about the samba-technical