Starting on a Samba 4.0 'complete' debian package

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at
Wed Dec 19 05:24:10 MST 2012

On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 07:59 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Andrew Bartlett (abartlet at
> > As far as I'm aware, no other debian package of the complete Samba 4.0.0
> > release exists (if it does, I'll be be glad to know about it!). 
> Well, more or less, my own intent was to start working on this for
> Debian jessie. 
> What actually makes my life difficult for this is.....that I have no
> more idea of the place where jelmer is storing his work. Jelmer, is
> that

I pulled the experimental package from
git:// as indicated by

> (another thing that seem to make my life difficult is that my
> involvment in Debian seems to be shrinking nowadays, because real life
> and other hobbies are taking precedence)
> I'm afraid that the use of bzr by Jelmer makes a quite big step for me
> to deal with. Despite Steve langasek and Jelmer's numerous attempts to
> convince me that This Is Good For Us....I'm still a moron about all
> this. I can now manage to to my own packaging work in git for some of
> my packages, but I'm still using SVN for samba packaging.
> Still, my own projects for 2013 involve a participation to SambaXP
> (assuming my company is still OK to pay for this....) and have some
> merging work there on the way to a "samba" package for Debian that
> would be of course samba 4.x.y *and* provide a smooth upgrade path
> from samba 3.6 which we have in wheezy.
> That seems to be a distant date in the future, but it's not that far
> away and it would be good to gathe rtogetther all people who
> conttribute to Debian packages of samba, there (/you, Jelmer, Ivo de
> Decker, /me, Steve(?), Luk random order).
> > As I figure others might be interested in a combined package, I'm hoping
> > that someone might like to work with me to get this working, so we can
> > point Samba users at a complete build of the official release. 
> We have 3 things to merge:
> - Jelmer's work (probably in bzr somewhere)
> - your work ( in git)
> - the current samba3 packaging and its giant history (in
> SVN...including branches for various backports)
> Interesting challenge. And the most interesting one is "provide a
> completly smooth and transparent upgrade to users of 3.6
> packages". For file and print server setups, I have no doubts....for
> domain controllers, I'm more skeptical..:-)

I think for domain controllers, we should just provide the same features
they currently have.  The 'samba4' package in experimental has the
ability to call samba-tool domain classicupgrade, and this can certainly
be offered, but it isn't required unless folks actively want to upgrade.

Andrew Bartlett

Andrew Bartlett                      
Authentication Developer, Samba Team 

More information about the samba-technical mailing list