One FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE and others (likely) SIGRTMIN is 65!
Lucas.James at LDJcs.Com.Au
Sun Dec 16 19:17:22 MST 2012
Language differences aside, labelling someones efforts to find out why
something is not working as a "useless job" is bordering on insulting
and definitely not helpful. As to "doing it you(r) own "unique" way",
all the HOWTOs do not mention ports, so just about everyone is doing it
that way. If Richard is trying Samba4, and he wants a more recent
version than Alpha11, he has to do it that way.
Apart from that, excellent work on the ports.
Richard: Have a look at Timur's patches in the net/samba3 and
devel/tevent ports to see if there are any enlightening information.
On 16/12/2012 23:22, Timur I. Bakeyev wrote:
> It just means that you doing useless job and all your complains are result
> of doing it you own "unique" way.
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe at gmail.com
>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Timur I. Bakeyev <timur at com.bat.ru>
>>> You don't use ports, do you?
>> This might be true, but how is it relevant?
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Richard Sharpe
>>> <realrichardsharpe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> On FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE we have
>>>> #define SIGRTMIN 65
>>>> This means that tevent_common_add_signal fails with EINVAL.
>>>> Richard Sharpe
>> Richard Sharpe
I was going to include a witty saying
But I couldn't think of one
More information about the samba-technical