Confused about samba4 & s3fs

[steve]

On 16/08/12 16:10, Arvid Requate wrote:
> Hi,
>
> maybe I should have explained more clearly,

No, that's a good POV.

All we need is confirmation from the devs of what they want. Which is it?

1. recommend we test s3fs
2. do not use s3fs
3. use ntvfs
4. use smbd on a member server S3 box for everything

Yeah, I know. 'It depends'. Some rough guidelines would be great.

As s3fs is working so well for us and is so easy to setup, I'm very 
tempted to go with 1.

Cheers,
Steve