samba4: bind error #define DLZ_DLOPEN_VERSION 1
urushkin at telros.ru
Sat Apr 21 06:09:05 MDT 2012
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:40 AM, steve <steve at steve-ss.com> wrote:
>> On 19/04/12 12:36, Kev Latimer wrote:
>>> On 19/04/2012 10:32, steve wrote:
>>>> On 19/04/12 10:39, Kev Latimer wrote:
>>>>> On 19/04/2012 09:38, Kev Latimer wrote:
>>>>>> On 18/04/2012 16:04, Amitay Isaacs wrote:
>>> According to Amitay, it should build two files, dlz_bind9.so for
>>> 9.8 and
>>> dlz_bind9_9.so for 9.9; for us, it just seems to build a single
>>> dlz_bind9.so, which only works on 9.9...
>>> I used the same trick as you did to build a 9.8 module and I'm back
>>> up and
>>> The only thing I can think of is that we upgraded our Samba's to
>>> this problem, no fresh install. Think I'll quickly build it on a
>>> machine and see if a new install makes a difference on the modules
>> Hi Kev, hi everyone
>> The file that causes the trouble is:
>> Previously it only had the one option: that for 9.8. As it stands,
>> defaults to 9.9, which is why I asked if we were intended to move to
>> newer version. Maybe Amitay has a different new build??
>> Any clarification on this stuff?
> Hi Steve,
> As Günter pointed out, I have made changes to the build, so now
> instead of building single dlz_bind9.so, it builds dlz_bind9.so and
> dlz_bind9_9.so. This means you don't have to mess with the code if
> are using BIND 9.9. If you are using BIND 9.8, then everything should
> work as is. Please make sure there are no local changes in the code.
> Confirm that when you build samba, it builds two modules dlz_bind9.so
> and dlz_bind9_9.so. And then continue to use dlz_bind9.so for BIND
Hi. I have the same issue with 9.8. Tried today's master snapshot
(Version 4.0.0alpha20-GIT-c0ba829) (used new empty directory for git
and now I have single dlz_bind9.so and
dlz_dlopen: incorrect version 2 should be 1 in
So, seems there is something wrong with this new feature. What
additional information may I give you?
More information about the samba-technical