bind_dlz "required"?
Andrew Bartlett
abartlet at samba.org
Fri Apr 20 06:13:32 MDT 2012
On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 10:28 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 20 April 2012 01:32, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > Or, try the upgrade against with BIND 9.8 or 9.8 and bind_dlz, as that
> > is what we require these days (until we get the internal dns server
> > finished, when that will be another option).
>
> Do you mean that the flat file DNS backend is not expected to work
> properly any more? Or did I misinterpret your message?
At this point, yes, I would like to deprecate our bind 9.7 support.
Configuring dynamic DNS with this version is the stuff of nightmares -
very few manage to get it correct, and it just confuses our
documentation and makes our users think there is a chance it could work
for them.
We now provide an upgrade script to our database-based backends, and our
internal DNS server handles just as much as 9.7 did for most users: that
is a static zone or insecure updates.
We could continue to output a template zone file if need be, but I think
we should leave it as 'for manual installation in your own static dns
server'.
Andrew Bartlett
--
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list