redundant DNS setup with bind_dlz possible ?

[Andreas Oster]

Am 12.04.2012 16:32, schrieb Daniele Dario: 

> Hi Andreas,
> 
> On
Thu, 2012-04-12 at 16:25 +0200, Daniele Dario wrote:
> 
>> On Thu,
2012-04-12 at 15:22 +0200, Andreas Oster wrote: ... 
>> 
>>> Hello
Daniele, I have now set up a second DC and joined it to AD. I have seen
that replication of ForestDnsZones and DomainDnsZones in
private/sam.ldb.d is working, but I am missing the private/dns part.
samba_upgradedns gave the same error as Justin has observed. best
regards Andreas
>> Hallo Andreas, for me (I've just demoted the
secondary DC and than reinstalled and re-joined it to the domain) I
don't see DNS zones in private/sam.ldb.d. I guess that for you,
samba-tool drs showrepl shows also the DNS zones in the INBOUND and
OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS isn't it? Daniele.
> 
> After trying to run
samba_upgradedns, even if zones were not replicated,
> I've seen that
DNS zones appeared on sam.ldb.d.
> 
> Can you confirm that the DNS
partitions are currently replicated (drs
> showrepl should show them)?
>

> Thanks,
> Daniele.

Hello Daniele, 

yes I can confirm, that I see
inbound replication on second DC for ForestDnsZones and DomainDnsZones
coming from first DC. I do see any sign of either inbound or outbound
replication on the first DC though. 

best regards 

Andreas