Search bases for dlz_bind9

Amitay Isaacs amitay at gmail.com
Mon Sep 19 15:59:32 MDT 2011


Hi Stefan,

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Stefan Gohmann <gohmann at univention.de>wrote:

> Hello Amitay,
>
> Am Samstag 17 September 2011 schrieb Amitay Isaacs:
> > I am currently testing some changes in dlz_bind9 to run BIND without
> > requiring running samba server. :)
>
> That sounds interesting. Do you have a git branch or patches for this?
>
> At the moment it seems to be necessary to restart bind after a samba
> restart:
>
> root at master51:~# host deadlock5.local
> deadlock5.local has address 10.201.5.1
> root at master51:~# /etc/init.d/samba4 stop
> Stopping Samba 4 daemon: samba.
> root at master51:~# host deadlock5.local
> Host deadlock5.local not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> root at master51:~# /etc/init.d/samba4 start
> Starting Samba 4 daemon: samba.
> root at master51:~# host deadlock5.local
> Host deadlock5.local not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> root at master51:~# /etc/init.d/bind9 restart
> Restarting bind9 daemon: .
> done.
> root at master51:~# nscd -i hosts; host deadlock5.local
> deadlock5.local has address 10.201.5.1
>
> Cheers
> Stefan
>
>
That's the main reason for the changes. I am working on some of the issues
related to replication of DNS data from samba to windows. So the AD based
dns is not yet ready for deployment. :)

Amitay.


More information about the samba-technical mailing list