Bind9 DLZ not resolving _ldap._tcp.dom.tld?

[Gémes Géza]

2011-10-28 19:42 keltezéssel, Michael Croes írta:
>
> Hi,
>
> I actually used your example, however that doesn't work for me with
> bind 9.9.0. That actually makes sense, because it reduces the amount
> of unnecessary lookups. Anyway it's hereby somewhat documented.
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
> Op 28 okt. 2011 19:15 schreef "Gémes Géza" <geza at kzsdabas.hu
> <mailto:geza at kzsdabas.hu>> het volgende:
>
>     2011-10-28 16:26 keltezéssel, Michael Croes írta:
>     > Dear list,
>     >
>     > I solved the 'issue', so here is the 'solution' for future
>     reference:
>     >
>     > The dlz line in named.conf needs to contain the dns zone name, not
>     > just any string.
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     >
>     > Michael
>     >
>     > 2011/10/28 Michael Croes <mycroes at gmail.com
>     <mailto:mycroes at gmail.com>>:
>     >> Dear list,
>     >>
>     >> Sorry for my ignorance, it's not just _ldap._tcp.dom.tld that's not
>     >> working, but everthing in .dom.tld. Is there any way to get more
>     >> information from the dlz_bind9 module? I'm under the impression
>     Bind
>     >> isn't using it at all (it is loading it according to the log).
>     >> Regards,
>     >>
>     >> Michael
>     >>
>     >> 2011/10/28 Michael Croes <mycroes at gmail.com
>     <mailto:mycroes at gmail.com>>:
>     >>> Dear list,
>     >>>
>     >>> I just upgraded to Samba 4 alpha 17 and bind 9.9.0 and
>     configured bind
>     >>> to use the DLZ module. Resolving of the primary DC works, but
>     I can't
>     >>> resolve _ldap._tcp.dom.tld (SRV) or _kerberos.dom.tld (TXT).
>     Is this
>     >>> somehow intended?
>     >>> Regards,
>     >>>
>     >>> Michael
>     >>>
>     IMHO you should have had some other misconfiguration, in my test
>     domain
>     (with a working bind 9.8.1) my zone declaration looks like:
>
>     dlz "AD DNS Zone" {
>        database "dlopen /usr/local/samba/modules/bind9/dlz_bind9.so";
>     };
>
>     I wouldn't call "AD DNS Zone" a real zone name.
>
>     Cheers
>
>     Geza
>
If I would you I would look up the bind 9.8->9.9 changelog, if that
gives no results I would ask the bind people about what changes would
have gone undocumented. It seems that the bind changes could be the
cause of the differences.

Cheers

Geza