[PATCH 2/6] leases: fix write-open/read-lease race
J. Bruce Fields
bfields at fieldses.org
Fri Oct 28 02:46:27 MDT 2011
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 05:59:11PM -0400, bfields wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:58:13AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > In setlease, we use i_writecount to decide whether we can give out a
> > read lease.
> >
> > In open, we break leases before incrementing i_writecount.
> >
> > There is therefore a window between the break lease and the i_writecount
> > increment when setlease could add a new read lease.
> >
> > This would leave us with a simultaneous write open and read lease, which
> > shouldn't happen.
>
> Al, could you apply this for 3.2, if you don't see any problem?
Ping? What should I do with this patch?
--b.
>
> (Patch 1 of this series only touches locks.c, and I'm queueing up such
> patches through the nfsd tree. Patches 3-6 I intend to rewrite,
> probably not in time for 3.2 unless I'm very lucky.)
>
> --b.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > fs/namei.c | 5 +----
> > fs/open.c | 4 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> > index 2826db3..6ff59e5 100644
> > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > @@ -2044,10 +2044,7 @@ static int may_open(struct path *path, int acc_mode, int flag)
> > if (flag & O_NOATIME && !inode_owner_or_capable(inode))
> > return -EPERM;
> >
> > - /*
> > - * Ensure there are no outstanding leases on the file.
> > - */
> > - return break_lease(inode, flag);
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static int handle_truncate(struct file *filp)
> > diff --git a/fs/open.c b/fs/open.c
> > index f711921..22c41b5 100644
> > --- a/fs/open.c
> > +++ b/fs/open.c
> > @@ -685,6 +685,10 @@ static struct file *__dentry_open(struct dentry *dentry, struct vfsmount *mnt,
> > if (error)
> > goto cleanup_all;
> >
> > + error = break_lease(inode, f->f_flags);
> > + if (error)
> > + goto cleanup_all;
> > +
> > if (!open && f->f_op)
> > open = f->f_op->open;
> > if (open) {
> > --
> > 1.7.4.1
> >
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list