Jeremy Allison jra at samba.org
Wed Oct 19 09:15:05 MDT 2011

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 07:00:08PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 09:03 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > 
> > I've finished the first half of this, and updated the branch.  
> > http://git.samba.org/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/s3-auth-gensec-module-2
> > 
> > The next step is to only keep the struct gensec_security around long
> > term (as we only ever use that member after auth_ntlmssp_client_start())
> > 
> > Thanks for all your patience and review on this.
> Metze,
> I've now done the final patches you should need for the common smb
> client lib, updated at the URL above.  I think I'll take a break before
> I do any more gensec work in s3, to let this settle in.  I do hope to
> get the last of the ntlmssp client code in common, but it is no longer
> urgent for your work. 
> Jeremy,
> You may wish to look carefully at these changes to the smb sealing code:

Will do - thanks for the heads-up !

> This patch removes the server-only context:
> http://git.samba.org/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=commitdiff;h=3cc013eb40711ab7250a57dfca8b4ae45da95d98
> This patch uses gensec_wrap() and gensec_unwrap().  I'll need to test
> against an older version of Samba for this change, as any bug here is
> highly likely to be symmetric:
> http://git.samba.org/?p=abartlet/samba.git/.git;a=commitdiff;h=e15b5c8c36ef46ef3e644168be50e7c56a49baf7

Yeah, and version of smbclient 3.6.0 or earlier used
with the "-e" option should be able to test this.

Try doing a large "tar" operation or recursive copy
to test it out fully.



More information about the samba-technical mailing list