why do we test for TDB_ERR_NESTING?

[Rusty Russell]

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:39:19 +1100, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/mixed
> It seems we have this test for TDB_ERR_NESTING, but we do not actually
> use the result as far as I can see.
> 
> Can anybody remember the history here, or give me a reason why we should
> not just remove the test?  It seems we simply rely on the TDB version
> number, and use the internal TDB if not new enough (rather than testing
> for particular features). 

Makes sense.

Thanks,
Rusty.