CIFS: Rename bug on servers not supporting inode numbers
Günter Kukkukk
linux at kukkukk.com
Wed Nov 23 22:08:29 MST 2011
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 19:00:16 Amit Sahrawat wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> Ok, translations cannot be added easily. But any idea why surrogate
> pairs are not handled? I think handling for surrogate pairs can be
> added by identifying proper points(there are not many I guess). Please
> share your views.
>
> Regards,
> Amit Sahrawat
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Alan Cox <alan at lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:31:47 -0500 (EST)
> >
> > Alan Stern <stern at rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, NamJae Jeon wrote:
> >> > Hi. Alan.
> >> > Would you know why there is no upper/lower case table in nls utf8 ?
> >> > And Currently Surrogate pair is not supported also in nls utf8. Is
> >> > there the reason ?
> >>
> >> I don't know.
> >
> > For one case translations are locale specific and very very complicated.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
> > in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
"Surrogate pairs" had to been implemented to extend the former
16 bit limit of UCS-2/UTF-16.
Unicode has been limited to max 0x0010FFFF glyphs - which
would not fit in UCS-2/UTF-16.
To extend UTF-16, the "surrogate range" between D800 and DFFF was "stolen"
from the one of the previously named "Private Use Areas" of UCS-2.
-----
Have those "surrogate pairs" any impact on _todays_ linux file name conventions?
I think the easy answer is NO !
AFAIK - _no_ current operating system is supporting this!
We are talking here about "allowed dir/file name characters"!
The main reason behind "Surrogate pairs" was to allow "userland" (!)
applications to use worldwide special character glyphs!
---------
Anyway - in nls_base.c
.....
static const struct utf8_table utf8_table[] =
{
{0x80, 0x00, 0*6, 0x7F, 0, /* 1 byte sequence */},
{0xE0, 0xC0, 1*6, 0x7FF, 0x80, /* 2 byte sequence */},
{0xF0, 0xE0, 2*6, 0xFFFF, 0x800, /* 3 byte sequence */},
{0xF8, 0xF0, 3*6, 0x1FFFFF, 0x10000, /* 4 byte sequence */},
{0xFC, 0xF8, 4*6, 0x3FFFFFF, 0x200000, /* 5 byte sequence */},
{0xFE, 0xFC, 5*6, 0x7FFFFFFF, 0x4000000, /* 6 byte sequence */},
{0, /* end of table */}
};
........
that configured range exceeds the max. allowed unicode range 0x0010FFFF
and _must_ be changed to:
static const struct utf8_table utf8_table[] =
{
{0x80, 0x00, 0*6, 0x7F, 0, /* 1 byte sequence */},
{0xE0, 0xC0, 1*6, 0x7FF, 0x80, /* 2 byte sequence */},
{0xF0, 0xE0, 2*6, 0xFFFF, 0x800, /* 3 byte sequence */},
{0xF8, 0xF0, 3*6, 0x1FFFFF, 0x10000, /* 4 byte sequence */},
{0, /* end of table */}
};
Cheers, Günter
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list