Skipped groups in idmap2 on a cluster (with CTDB and GPFS)
Richard Sharpe
realrichardsharpe at gmail.com
Tue May 24 14:42:35 MDT 2011
Hi,
Has anyone seen cases where group numbers have been skipped (ie, not allocated).
We are allocating numbers up in the range 16777216 and up.
I am investigating a problem and I find that the output from wbinfo -G
from 16777309 to 16777320 shows a gap of unallocated GIDs from
16777310 to 16777313.
However, there is a file/dir that was created via Samba that has the
GID 16777312 in its ACL.
Any suggestions on what has happened?
--
Regards,
Richard Sharpe
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list