samba4, samba-tool command
Jelmer Vernooij
jelmer at samba.org
Tue May 3 08:56:03 MDT 2011
Hi Theresa,
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 20:20 -0400, Theresa Halloran wrote:
> My name is Theresa and I'm new to samba development! I work in
> Poughkeepsie NY at IBM and am new to linux as well, although I did work
> on linux tooling several years ago for linux on z/series.
Welcome! :)
> I started looking around samba 4 for places where I might be able to
> help out, with assistance from Tridge and Steve French. The samba-tool
> command seems like an area where some work is needed and I think I can
> contribute. One thing I've noticed is that there doesn't seem to be a
> consistent format for command syntax and sub-commands. That makes it
> difficult to use, especially for someone like me, who is new to the
> product and learning samba.
I guess it's got quite a bit of history - it's derived from the C
implementation of "net" in Samba 4 which was based on an old copy of the
C-based "net" binary in Samba 3...
> I put together a wiki page:
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba-tool-external
>
> This wiki page has two tables. The first, documents the commands that
> are currently implemented in samba 4, their syntax (its not 100%
> complete, but close)...The second table has proposals for changes to
> existing commands that hopefully will make samba-tool more usable. ...
> I'll be filling in the second table and the wiki page with many more
> details as I go along, make decisions and start to think about the
> specific implementation changes needed to improve samba-tool.
>
> I'm also hoping to learn from and get input from all of you samba
> experts!! If you are interested, please take a look at the wiki page I
> put together and give me input / opinions / advice on how you might like
> to see the samba-tool evolve and improve. I look forward to hearing
> from you all.
Overall, this looks like a useful cleanup of the existing chaos.
I wonder if there's any reason for the gpo2 command to be named that
rather than just "gpo", which makes more sense to me.
For "samba-tool keytab export" the object probably should be "keytab",
with export being the sub-sub-command though I'm not sure whether we
would have more keytab subcommands. Do we ever need to import keytabs?
Like vampire, I think join has enough history behind it and not a
particularly useful object to operate on that it should stay as is.
Should password be a thing on its own ("samba-tool password set"),
rather than having it under user ("samba-tool user setpassword')? I'm
not sure either way. "samba-tool password" probably has more going for
it historically, but I think as a new user I would look under user.
Cheers,
Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20110503/27b3b920/attachment.pgp>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list