CH_DISPLAY and gettext
Michael Adam
obnox at samba.org
Thu Jun 23 14:04:07 MDT 2011
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Am 23.06.2011 19:20, schrieb Jeremy Allison:
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 02:16:01AM +0900, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
> >>
> >> That's what I (and my friends) insisted several years ago:
> >> http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-March/034638.html
> >> http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2004-March/034742.html
> >>
> >> Internal charset should be fixed. UTF-8 is acceptable but UTF-16 may
> >> be better because UTF-16 is more suitable for string manipulation than
> >> UTF-8.
> >
> > I disagree with that. UTF-16 is just as bad for string manipulation
> > as UTF-8, due to compose characters. UTF-16 isn't a fixed length
> > representation either.
>
> And UTF-16 doesn't work as a native C String (char *).
> We should really try to just use UTF-8 internally.
I am really glad that there seems to be some support for my idea.
And also that it has been around for quite some time.
So I am feeling less freaky to bring it up (again) ;-)
I will think about more details...
Cheers - Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 206 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20110623/be168121/attachment.pgp>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list