SMB2 not used with \\server\share but with \\server.domain\share
lists at wiesinger.com
Mon Jun 13 01:43:35 MDT 2011
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Both run on 445, SMB1/2 is negotiated in the very first
> packets. SMB1 definitely works over 139, not sure Windows
> would do it as well over that port. But there's no reason
> from within the protocol that would prevent it.
Yes, I'm seening the negotiation on protocol in both cases. But the
problem is that Vista doesn't request SMB2 in the negotiation phase when
\\server\share syntax is used but on \\server.domain\share syntax it is
offered by Vista and used by Samba.
Are that maybe some backward compability issues from the protocol
and/or Vista that when \\server\share syntax is used it CAN'T be SMB2?
Any further ideas?
More information about the samba-technical