Samba oplock level II problem

[Pavel Shilovsky]

2011/1/24 Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy at gmail.com>:
> 2011/1/24 Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at sernet.de>:
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 05:57:05PM +0300, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
>>> I reported about an oplock level II problem in
>>> https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7928. I want to discuss it
>>> here because I think it's the real seriuos bug, that can raise a lot
>>> of data coherency problems.
>>
>> Sorry for not jumping on this with PRIORITY 1 DROP
>> EVERYTHING ELSE. My next step will be to write a torture
>> test in smbtorture that replicates the behaviour. If this is
>> so freaking urgent for you, you can help by writing this
>> test.
>>
>
> It's not so freaking and I like your idea to test it with torture.
> Thank you for a quick reply!
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Pavel Shilovsky.
>

I've just created smbtorture test that shows the problem:

http://git.etersoft.ru/people/piastry/packages/?p=samba4.git;a=commitdiff;h=7b957a3639280e7881a3fae226780cc3da1012ad;hp=619e5cb646b465a4d6a031cbb462878e096498a6

kernel oplocks options should be disabled and level2 oplocks should be
enabled in smb.conf to reproduce the difference between Samba and
Windows servers.

-- 
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky.