kill security=share and security=server

[Jeremy Allison]

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 07:36:01PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> Ok, maybe you're right. I think it gives different semantics
> though depending on which client OS you're coming from, or
> what protocol the client decides to use

I think this only affects clients using Win9x or below,
who would notice the change in the bit we return in the
negprot that specifies user level security - which this
patch would now always return.

I don't think any modern (XP or later) clients ever
use the non-sessionsetup varients anymore.

> I would feel better
> if we had max protocol = smb1 for all security=share configs.

Well we already log a message telling the user what we're
doing - do you want me to make this debug level 0 so it
can't be ignored (currently it's level 2).

I just don't want to cause smbd to silently exit on
the first smb2 packet with share level security (which
we used to do).

Jeremy.