kill security=share and security=server (Re: [SCM] Samba Shared Repository - branch v3-6-test updated)

[Christopher R. Hertel]

Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> Am 26.01.2011 20:53, schrieb simo:
>> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:47 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:30:26PM -0500, simo wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 20:24 +0100, Jeremy Allison wrote:
:
>> I vote for killing security = share over SMB2

It makes sense to disable security = share for SMB2.

Unfortunately, for SMB1 many people still use share-mode authentication in
low-level applications, such as home servers.

>> Anyone else up to vote for killing it ?
> 
> Does Windows7 supports that, if not we should get rid of it.
> 
> And I'd also love to get rid of security=server
> and auth/auth_server.c

It a bit of a kludge, but it is useful in some situations.  I'll abstain
from voting on this one.

Chris -)-----

-- 
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/     -)-----   Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/   -)-----   ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/     -)-----   crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/    -)-----   crh at ubiqx.org