DLIST changes

[Sam Liddicott]

On 25/01/11 01:54, tridge wrote:
>   >  Perhaps the best would be to remove the third argument and it's users?
>   >  It is only used in 120 lines of code, and the compiler will show when
>   >  the job hasn't been finished.
>
> yep, this is what I'd prefer. I left the 3rd argument there when I did
> the initial conversion in case we decided we didn't like the new
> linked list approach and decided to revert. The new approach has
> turned out really well, so it is time to remove that redundent
> argument.
>
> Cheers, Tridge
As my good deed, I will prepare such a patch.

Thanks guys.

Sam