mapping SYNCHRONIZE permission in NTFS ACL for ZFS
Paul B. Henson
henson at acm.org
Tue Jan 11 17:27:44 MST 2011
On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, David Disseldorp wrote:
> FWIW the proposed NFSv4.1 spec (rfc5661) uses a completely different
> interpretation of the synchronize permission much closer in line with
> the Windows definition:
Given NFSv4 ACL's were based on NTFS ACL's, it does seem to make more sense
to provide similar semantics, although given they still won't be enforced
on the server side it's mostly a documentation change.
> This will not play nice with applications that explicitly disable the
> synchronize permission.
Perhaps an option to the zfs_acl module then allowing my proposed behavior
to be enabled only when desired?
--
Paul B. Henson | (909) 979-6361 | http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst | henson at csupomona.edu
California State Polytechnic University | Pomona CA 91768
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list