DCOM port 1024
tms3 at tms3.com
tms3 at tms3.com
Mon Feb 14 14:27:28 MST 2011
>
>
> X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- Start ASpam results ---------------
> X-SpamDetect-Info: This message may be spam. This message BODY has
> been altered to show you the spam information
> X-SpamDetect: ********: 8.0 sd=8.0 [79]89%6.4(SPF Neutral)
> [212]87%5.6(!46,60) [94]69%0.8(Suspicious proportio)
> [27]46%-0.0(X-LangGuess:English) [sig=3] [nnot=0,nis=0,0.0]
> X-SpamDetect-Info: ------------- End ASpam results -----------------
>
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:07 -0800, tms3 at tms3.com wrote:
>>
>> This came up on the samba lists for Samba4 firewall issues. Is this
>> DCOM port really necessary? What does the samba AD model use it for?
>>
>> TIA for any info, always appreciated.
> Can you provide some more context?
Only thing running on this server is Samba4, sshd, ntpd:
Active Internet connections (including servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
(state)
tcp4 0 0 192.168.64.3.139 192.168.164.100.54657
SYN_RCVD
tcp4 0 0 192.168.64.3.1024 192.168.64.6.1095
ESTABLISHED
tcp4 0 0 192.168.64.3.445 192.168.64.125.59802
ESTABLISHED
tcp4 0 0 *.3269 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.3268 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.636 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.389 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.464 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.88 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.135 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.1024 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.139 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.445 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 52 192.168.64.3.22 192.168.64.125.53773
ESTABLISHED
tcp4 0 0 127.0.0.1.25 *.*
LISTEN
tcp4 0 0 *.22 *.*
LISTEN
tcp6 0 0 *.22 *.*
LISTEN
udp4 0 0 192.168.64.3.464 *.*
udp4 0 0 192.168.64.3.88 *.*
udp4 0 0 *.464 *.*
udp4 0 0 *.88 *.*
udp4 0 0 192.168.64.3.389 *.*
udp4 0 0 *.389 *.*
udp4 0 0 192.168.64.3.138 *.*
udp4 0 0 192.168.64.255.138 *.*
udp4 0 0 192.168.64.3.137 *.*
udp4 0 0 192.168.64.255.137 *.*
udp4 0 0 *.138 *.*
udp4 0 0 *.137 *.*
udp4 0 0 *.514 *.*
udp6 0 0 *.514 *.*
Note 1024 is up and running. The machine with ip 192.168.64.6 is a
W2K3R server binding to port 1024, so it is being used.
>
>
>
> The port assignment (like most interfaces over ncacn_ip_tcp) of the
> DCOM
> interfaces is dynamically allocated.
Well dynamically, starting with 1024 and moving up the scale should
the first choice be claimed.
>
> As far as I know we also don't
> enable DCOM by default anymore.
I was somewhat surprised when the email on samba-lists regarding ip
tables configuration came back with a need to open 1024, and I went
and looked on my servers and found it listening and active.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jelmer
>
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list