kerberos dynamic DNS and the internal DNS server
Hullen at t-online.de
Wed Dec 28 01:43:00 MST 2011
Du meintest am 28.12.11:
> Anyway, if everybody keeps telling people to not use the internal DNS
> until it's tested, and does have all sorts of extra features, it'll
> never get tested. I know it's still missing features, but currently
> it's only me working on this thing and I do have a day job.
Just for curiosity: many months ago I asked for using "dnsmasq" instead
of "ISC bind" as nameserver, and I was told that there was no planning
for using another (external) nameserver than "bind". My heart doesn't
belong to "dnsmasq" - I only need a simple nameserver, and "bind" isn't
What about your plans for an internal nameserver?
More information about the samba-technical