Problems handling chain offsets with OS/2's WriteAndX/ReadAndX (samba: message 9 of 10)
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at ubiqx.mn.org
Sat Aug 6 14:45:55 MDT 2011
samba.10.maazl at spamgourmet.com wrote:
> On 06.08.11 19.15, Volker Lendecke - Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 03:49:06AM +0200,
>> samba.10.maazl at spamgourmet.com wrote:
>>> Thie first difference is the returned offset in the WriteAndX reply.
>>> Windows returns 47 while samba returns 48 - whatever this means.
>>> I disabled all checks in process.c chain_reply to get that far.
>> Please send a full network trace together with a new
>> corresponding debug level 10 log. Please see
> Unfortunately this is impossible, since all my machines except for the
> windows laptop are virtual machines on the same physical host and
> wireshark does not support capturing the internal traffic. So all I have
> regarding OS/2 and Linux is the samba log.
Which virtual machine technology are you using?
Why don't you just run tcpdump or Wireshark on the virtual Linux machine?
"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)----- Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/ -)----- ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.mn.org
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/ -)----- crh at ubiqx.org
More information about the samba-technical