Problems handling chain offsets with OS/2's WriteAndX/ReadAndX (samba: message 9 of 10)

Christopher R. Hertel crh at
Sat Aug 6 14:45:55 MDT 2011

samba.10.maazl at wrote:
> On 06.08.11 19.15, Volker Lendecke - Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 03:49:06AM +0200,
>> samba.10.maazl at wrote:
>>> Thie first difference is the returned offset in the WriteAndX reply.
>>> Windows returns 47 while samba returns 48 - whatever this means.
>>> I disabled all checks in process.c chain_reply to get that far.
>> Please send a full network trace together with a new
>> corresponding debug level 10 log. Please see
> Unfortunately this is impossible, since all my machines except for the
> windows laptop are virtual machines on the same physical host and
> wireshark does not support capturing the internal traffic. So all I have
> regarding OS/2 and Linux is the samba log.

Which virtual machine technology are you using?

Why don't you just run tcpdump or Wireshark on the virtual Linux machine?

Chris -)-----

"Implementing CIFS - the Common Internet FileSystem" ISBN: 013047116X
Samba Team --     -)-----   Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team --   -)-----   ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team --     -)-----   crh at
OnLineBook --    -)-----   crh at

More information about the samba-technical mailing list