Should we keep the Samba4 LDAP backend?

[Kai Blin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2011-04-02 12:21, Oliver Liebel wrote:

Hi folks,

> - A DirSync-based "Single-Shot"/ Master-Slave - Replication Mech (e.g.
> implemented as an Overlay for this Function)
> could be a Solution for many Companys, that dont need permanent Sync
> between ADS and S4/OL.

This one actually surprises me as somebody who doesn't really deal with
production set-ups. Isn't the whole point of S4 to have ADS support? Why
wouldn't you want to keep ADS and S4 in sync, regardless of the LDAP
backend used by S4?

Confused greetings,
Kai

- -- 
Kai Blin
Worldforge developer http://www.worldforge.org/
Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin
Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2XCswACgkQEKXX/bF2FpTmFQCeJELyrU4j9Sbk2CPzmRyb3U45
wDcAn2+0CU/IgpYTPq6+FNdiZ3wtLCBk
=9KRB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----