Should we keep the Samba4 LDAP backend?

[Jelmer Vernooij]

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 19:29 +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> My proposal, if accepted, would be simply to remove the wiki pages and
> the ability to build the ldap-backend with provision (perhaps leaving an
> option for the test scripts).  
> 
> When we later need to make some change that is directly incompatible
> with the LDAP backend, then we can easily decide to do that later,
> knowing it is no longer a goal.
> 
> What do folks think?
+1. It may still be nice to pursue in the future, but let's not have it
hold us up for now. 

Cheers,

Jelmer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20110401/245aeb4a/attachment.pgp>