samldb and associated patches

[Kamen Mazdrashki]

Hi Matthias,

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:30, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw at samba.org>wrote:

> Hi Kamen,
>
> now I've reworked and fixed up my patchset and enhanced another time
> "deletetest.py". Regarding "nTDSConnection" objects I would like to call
> into mind that these are subobjects of "nTDSDSA" ones which you are only
> allowed to create on DC vampire operations (manually trials to create these
> end in UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM). So I cannot create arbitrary server objects
> with connection objects associated. Well, the "urgent_replication" test uses
> the relax hack to achieve this, but I think it's really undesired behaviour.
> Probably it's better to use another kind of objects for testing. Do you
> have an idea? If you are satisfied with my results I'm happy if you merge it
> in.
>
> I think it looks good now.
I am only little bit concerned about changes in made in
source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_deleted.c<http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=mdw/samba.git;a=blob;f=source4/dsdb/kcc/kcc_deleted.c;h=1726fa4f318a2f18893c6866ef05274bec7533af;hb=8525a44fabcb118ccd5a527e9b9eadb045894df7>
:
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=mdw/samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=8525a44fabcb118ccd5a527e9b9eadb045894df7#patch2
But kcc_deleted is just a basic implementation anyway.

Regarding "nTDSConnection" object -> kcc service creates them also. You may
want to
peek kcc implementation how it is done.
I think that "Active Directory Sites and Services Manager" is also able to
create
Connection objects, but I am not sure how it does this.


-- 
CU,
Kamen