samldb and associated patches
Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
mdw at samba.org
Wed Sep 29 01:30:05 MDT 2010
Hi Kamen,
now I've reworked and fixed up my patchset and enhanced another time
"deletetest.py". Regarding "nTDSConnection" objects I would like to call
into mind that these are subobjects of "nTDSDSA" ones which you are only
allowed to create on DC vampire operations (manually trials to create
these end in UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM). So I cannot create arbitrary server
objects with connection objects associated. Well, the
"urgent_replication" test uses the relax hack to achieve this, but I
think it's really undesired behaviour.
Probably it's better to use another kind of objects for testing. Do you
have an idea? If you are satisfied with my results I'm happy if you
merge it in.
Greets,
Matthias
Kamen Mazdrashki wrote:
> Well, it seems nTDSConnection objects doesn't have it.
> This is what I'am observing on my w2k8-r2 test box.
> It will really help if we have a test for this, so we could 'certify'
> any further changes in this code.
>
> --
> CU,
> Kamen
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list