samba4: upgradeprovision --full fails

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at samba.org
Mon Sep 27 00:25:23 MDT 2010


On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 10:03 +0400, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Can you first write me once ? receiving twice as much email didn't 
> please me much ....
> 
> Then if you don't have the will to dig a little bit on your own the pb, 
> don't update every day your version of samba 4 it's alpha software after 
> all !
> 
> 
> > Following up on my own post:
> >
> >> Starting update of samdb
> >> There are 1 missing objects
> >> Object CN=dns-lucid,CN=Users,DC=test,DC=com will be added
> > Upon restart, dns.keytab is now empty and hence, dns update is toast.
> > I did notice that secrets.ldb now has an entry named dns-<hostname>
> > after update, but there is no corresponding entry in sam.ldb.
> 
> 
> You are not the first one to run mostly everyday upgradeprovision after 
> updating to the latest git tree, doing so will mostly drives you in 
> trouble. As I say the rule of thumb is: if there is an update to 
> upgradeprovision (git log scripting/bin/upgradeprovision for instance) 
> then you might want to run upgradeprovision otherwise just don't.

It should be noted that old provision databases normally work quite
fine.  There usually isn't a need for upgradeprovision - so in the day
to day updates you may do in a development or testing environment, reach
for that very useful tool when you need it.  Otherwise, most things will
just keep working just as they did before. 

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett                                http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Authentication Developer, Samba Team           http://samba.org
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical/attachments/20100927/6237fc28/attachment.pgp>


More information about the samba-technical mailing list