samldb and associated patches

Andrew Bartlett abartlet at
Thu Sep 23 19:29:33 MDT 2010

On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 04:24 +0300, Kamen Mazdrashki wrote:
> Hi Matthias, Andrew,
> Thanks for spotting&fixing delete object functionality!
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 03:33, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at>
> wrote:
>         On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 08:47 +0000, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer
>         wrote:
>         > Hi Andrew and others,
>         >
>         > my work under "dsdb_work" is ready to merge.
>         I've pushed everything except the isDeleted changes, because
>         Kamen has
>         expressed concerns about them, and wants to test them out
>         himself.
> I think it is ok, except for few minor things
> I think we should leave Python tests with just "show_deleted:1"
> control.
> We are deleting a normal objects and thus the result should be either
> Tombstone
> or Deleted-object, but no Recycled object.
> The test checks only repl_meta_data.c behavior, not subtree_delete.
> Do we have a test for subtree_delete module? I can't find one.
> I think it is ok to go 'in' this way, but it is good for us to have
> a subtree_delete tests.


Can you work with Matthias to get a correct set of patches for these,
and push them when you are happy?


Andrew Bartlett                      
Authentication Developer, Samba Team 
Samba Developer, Cisco Inc.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the samba-technical mailing list