samldb and associated patches

Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer mdw at
Wed Sep 22 02:47:54 MDT 2010

Hi Andrew and others,

my work under "dsdb_work" is ready to merge.


Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 22:58 +0200, Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>> I've reworked the patchset:
>>      * Patches until 196e1dfcfece636054a224cc5bd2904704671530 should work
>>        without problems (cosmetics and some enhancements to the SAMLDB
>>        primary group detection)
>>      * Patches until aca7270d7fc478385a933c81c3b1cc5d14e8da79 should also
>>        work (makes the most of the rootDSE attributes dynamic - I had to
>>        leave "dsServiceName" static for now since otherwise s4 stops working)
>>      * The patches afterwards fixes the delete operation. I found out
>>        that beginning with DC functional level>= 2008_R2 we need to make
>>        use of the SHOW_RECYCLED and not SHOW_DELETED control to find
>>        always all entries. Since otherwise recycled objects aren't
>>        handled. These patches try to fix this - would be nice if you
>>        could take a look if my thoughts are right.
>> It would be nice if you could start applying at least some parts. But
>> probably a "make test" is still useful.
> I'm rather confused as to exactly what commits you have prepared that
> are a tested and cohesive set.  Can you prepare me a tree, which passes
> 'make test' that you want to me to merge?
> Once you let me know exactly which of these patches you want merged, and
> which pass 'make test', I can look at it.
> Thanks,
> Andrew Bartlett

More information about the samba-technical mailing list